docs(python): Rename Getting Started to Getting Started by Example#9705
Closed
proxence wants to merge 4 commits into
Closed
docs(python): Rename Getting Started to Getting Started by Example#9705proxence wants to merge 4 commits into
Getting Started to Getting Started by Example#9705proxence wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
maryliag
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2026
4 tasks
Contributor
Author
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR closes the first task of this meta issue: #5692
The issue linked above provides full context but for a rough summary, the following discussion #4853 led to an agreed upon new approach for what the documentation structure should be. Those changes were made within the Java docs via several PRs and this is applying that same effort to the Python docs in smaller, more reviewable, changes.
Footnotes
Yes, I can answer maintainer questions about the content of this PR, without using AI. ↩